<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike Masnick's Blog &#187; blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masnick.com/category/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masnick.com</link>
	<description>Infrequently updated thoughts on something</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wanted: A Better Twitter Client</title>
		<link>http://www.masnick.com/2009/05/06/wanted-a-better-twitter-client/</link>
		<comments>http://www.masnick.com/2009/05/06/wanted-a-better-twitter-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masnick.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well over a year ago, I wrote about just how useful Twitter can be, and over time that&#8217;s only increased.  I have to admit that until about a month ago, I mostly just used Twitter in the web interface.  I did install Digsby as a client, but I basically just used that to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well over a year ago, I wrote about just how <a href="http://www.masnick.com/2008/02/05/the-usefulness-of-twitter/">useful</a> Twitter can be, and over time that&#8217;s only increased.  I have to admit that until about a month ago, I mostly just used Twitter in the web interface.  I did install Digsby as a client, but I basically just used that to notify me when new Twitter messages were showing up.  But then I kept hearing about neat things (such as groups) that <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/">TweetDeck</a> allowed, and I started playing with that.  It took some getting used to, but there were definite advantages.  Being able to set up groups/columns/persistent searches and laying it out in a nice format actually made Twitter that much more useful.  It became, as I noted in a Tweet sort of a &#8220;personal Bloomerg&#8221; for me.</p>
<p>But still&#8230; Tweetdeck had limitations.  While you could edit the colors (useful! white text on black background is awful for eye strain), there were limitations.  Then, I noticed that Tweetdeck was dropping a bunch of messages.  I&#8217;d only noticed because people would tweet something in reference to an earlier tweet&#8230; but that earlier tweet wouldn&#8217;t be there.  In the past few days it&#8217;s only gotten worse.  I asked for some suggestions for other apps and have now tested out both <a href="http://desktop.seesmic.com/">Seesmic Desktop</a> and <a href="https://destroytwitter.com/">Destroy Twitter</a>.  Both have some nice features&#8230; and others that are quite annoying.  People recommended both Tweetie and Nambu&#8230; but both are only available on Macs, so I couldn&#8217;t test them out.</p>
<p>Not that anyone actually reads this blog, but I thought I&#8217;d try to put together a feature list of what would make me happy on the Twitter client front (I&#8217;m leaving out the stuff that&#8217;s already pretty standard, such as URL shortener support, easy retweets, etc.).  If anyone develops a client with these features, please, please, please let me know:</p>
<ul>
<li> Customization!  Let me choose colors/fonts/sizes.  Tiny white text on a black background?  Sorry.  Unusable.
<li> Let me manage how many columns/groups I want.  When you limit what I can do, it just makes me want to look for other apps.  Tweetdeck seems to limit you to 10 columns.  Not sure about Seesmic. Destroy Twitter has 6 total columns (home/replies/direct messages/groups/search/saved tweets), and only displays three at a time (first three or last three).  You can do multiple groups/searches, but you can only see one at a time.   That gets annoying.  My screen can show more, so let me see more.  And making me manually switch between groups or searches?  Why?  Just show them all.
<li> Also, we don&#8217;t necessarily need the full column metaphor.  Why not set it up as a <b>canvas</b> and let me organize each option as I see fit?  Then I can set it up exactly as I want.  My full stream can be a full column, but I don&#8217;t get many direct messages.  So maybe I only want direct messages to be a small box in the corner, and then I can put a lower volume persistent search beneath it.  Let me organize how I see everything on an open canvas and I&#8217;d be much happier.
<li> Make it easy to set up groups &#8212; which means setting up multiple ways to manage groups.  Tweetdeck gives you a list of everyone you follow.  That works well until you have a ton of users you follow.  Seesmic only lets you add if you see people in your home timeline.  That&#8217;s awful.  I purposely set up groups so I make sure I can see important messages from people who don&#8217;t tweet often, but I don&#8217;t want to miss (like my mom or my wife).  Destroy Twitter shows you the first 4 (alphabetical) people you follow and then offers a search box.  Showing those first four users is useless and if I don&#8217;t remember the usernames, the search is useless.  Why not set up a combo of all of these?  Show the list.  Let people add from their stream.  And offer search.
<li>Notifications: Tweetdeck and Seesmic just tell me I have new messages (and in what buckets) but don&#8217;t display the messages themselves.  Destroy Twitter and Digsby at least show actual text in the notification&#8230; except both just show the latest message (Digsby lets you scroll to the &#8220;next&#8221; message if you get your mouse over the notification fast enough).  I would kind of like to see all the incoming messages displayed briefly.  That helps with the whole &#8220;ambient information&#8221; concept.
<li>Facebook integration is definitely nice &#8212; props to Tweetdeck and Seesmic for doing that&#8230; but why won&#8217;t either let me clear out those messages once seen?  I can clear out Twitter messages, but not Facebook messages.
<li>Server integration.  If I run the client on multiple machines, it should know what I&#8217;ve read/not read.
<li> Better handling of read/unread messages: make it easy to mark stuff as read and clear it out&#8230;. and then if I *do* want to go back, make that easy too.  Tweetdeck lets me clear out read messages, but if I shut it down and reopen&#8230; they&#8217;re back.  But if I don&#8217;t shut it down and reopen, there appears to be no way to get my &#8220;cleared&#8221; messages back.  If I want to see them again, I have to either shut down/reopen or go to the web interface.  Maybe just do what Gmail does and have an &#8220;archived&#8221; box/column that can be opened.
<li>Show me all my messages.  Not sure if this is an API limitation or what&#8230; but if I shut down for the night and open up Tweetdeck in the morning, it only shows me a few hours worth of messages.  I&#8217;d like to see everything since I last logged in.  At the very least, make this a user option&#8230; (related to this: Tweetdeck, STOP dropping messages).
<li>Memory management.  Stop being a memory hog!  All of you.  :)
</ul>
<p>I think that&#8217;s it for now&#8230; though I may have some other thoughts later.  What other features would be good?</p>
<p>I should note, by the way, that none of this is to disparage the work done on these apps.  They&#8217;ve all made Twitter much more useful &#8212; so I&#8217;m not trying to pull a Louis CK &#8220;everything&#8217;s great and I&#8217;m still pissed off&#8221; sorta thing.  I&#8217;m just finding that in making Twitter much better, they&#8217;re also exposing their limitations.  All of these apps are in early versions, so I&#8217;m hopeful that they&#8217;ll all get there eventually.  Hopefully this post helps someone get there faster.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.masnick.com/2009/05/06/wanted-a-better-twitter-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friends Who Blog?  Hmm&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.masnick.com/2007/01/10/friends-who-blog-hmm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.masnick.com/2007/01/10/friends-who-blog-hmm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masnick.com/2007/01/10/friends-who-blog-hmm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, okay, I recognize that now that I have a personal blog thing, I&#8217;m supposed to populate it with a blogroll on the side with links to friends who blog.  And, that&#8217;s the point that I realize I really don&#8217;t have that many friends who blog.  Very few of my close friends blog, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, okay, I recognize that now that I have a personal blog thing, I&#8217;m supposed to populate it with a blogroll on the side with links to friends who blog.  And, that&#8217;s the point that I realize I really don&#8217;t have that many friends who blog.  Very few of my close friends blog, and of those who do, they don&#8217;t blog very often.  There are &#8220;industry&#8221; blogs that I read that are written by people I know, but does it make sense to link to them from a personal site?</p>
<p>Coming up with a blogroll was much easier for Techdirt, when it was all about what sites I find interesting and read regularly.</p>
<p>Still, though, among the &#8220;friends who blog&#8221; category (and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m missing some), the winner in the category remains Mike Ho for his <a href="http://www.mikeho.com/">MikeHo.com</a> (alternate title: Mike Ho&#8217;s of the world UNITE!).  I believe it&#8217;s still built on Greymatter (remember Greymatter?  That was what we ran our first few Techdirt clients on back in 2000/2001).  It&#8217;s almost never updated, but when it is, it&#8217;s absolutely worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.masnick.com/2007/01/10/friends-who-blog-hmm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
